{"id":20135,"date":"2023-04-26T20:13:33","date_gmt":"2023-04-27T01:13:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20135"},"modified":"2023-04-26T20:13:33","modified_gmt":"2023-04-27T01:13:33","slug":"badminton-out-about-central-4-como-park-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20135","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Out & About: Central 4, Como Park 3"},"content":{"rendered":"

CENTRAL 4, COMO PARK 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

There have been two themes this week—4-3 scores, and revenge wins. Today it was Central\u2019s moment as they flipped an earlier loss to the Cougars with a 4-3 win at home. On March 30 Como Park prevailed 6-1. Today Central swept the doubles and added a first singles win by Zadie for the win. Zadie was not present in the first contest. Doubles proved to be the most competitive with the only three set matches of the day. The score was tied at 2 apiece with the first three singles and first doubles in the book. The deciding match would be at third doubles. Mai Shia and Fardosa needed to take the last two sets for the Minuteman victory. The final set was decided by the narrowest margin—two points. A flip of those two points and CP would have enjoyed the victory.<\/p>\n

SINGLES
\n<\/strong>1. Zadie, C def Xee Lee 21-6, 21-10
\n2. Betty Hebble, CP def Mayson 21-6, 21-18
\n3. Kaya Solheid, CP def Lennon 21-15, 21-16
\n4. Ta\u2019Liyah McNeal, CP def Lucy 21-17, 21-10<\/p>\n

DOUBLES
\n<\/strong>1. Isabel \/ Clara, C def Lisa Truong \/ Oo Meh 21-13, 21-10
\n2. LiLe \/ Red, C def Hehblut Paw \/ Michelle Vang 21-15, 16-21, 21-10
\n3. Mai Shia \/ Fardosa, C def Daychia Her \/ Tha Blay Htoo 18-21, 21-15, 21-19<\/p>\n

BY THE NUMBERS
\nSINGLES
\nMatches<\/strong>: Como Park 3-1 .750
\nGames<\/strong>: Como Park 6-2 .750
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Como Park 142-124 .534
\nSet 1 points:<\/strong> Como Park 69-59 .539
\nSet 2 points:<\/strong> Como Park 73-65 .529
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0split 2-2 .500
\ndecided by 3<\/strong>-: Como Park 1-0 1.000
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Como Park 2.25
\nDOUBLES
\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Central 3-0 1.000
\nGames<\/strong>:\u00a0Central 6-2 .750
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Central 160-124 .563
\nSet 1 points:<\/strong> Central 60-49 .550
\nSet 2 points:<\/strong> Central 58-46 .558
\nSet 3 points:<\/strong> Central 42-29 .592
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong> Central 2-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0Central 1-1 .500
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Central 4.500<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

ZADIE 2, XEE LEE 0 <\/strong>(21-7, 20-10)<\/p>\n

Central\u2019s Zadie scored the first six points at the start of each set and used that momentum for her straight set wins. As has been true all week, a strong side out game plus scoring winners when serving proved to be the separators. Zadie did not allow Xee Lee any runs today. Lee only scored four times on her serve, with Zadie ringing up 27. The odd stroke winners replicated that at a plus twelve advantage (13-1) for Zadie. Zadie\u2019s favorite scoring winner today was the smash—eight times, the same amount of total winners for Lee. Even though the match appeared lopsided, the stroke count showed long rallies. Half the points today lasted five strokes or longer. This category also belonged to Zadie 20-9.<\/p>\n

Zadie notched runs on her first two serves. The coup de gras was a seven point run that made it 18-5. Six of those points were winners, three of those were smashes. Again the stroke counts in that run indicated contentious points—14, 11, 7 and another 7. It was a two stroke soft drive that finished the set however.<\/p>\n

It was d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu all over again in the second set with Zadie duplicating that 6-0 lead and scoring runs on her first two services. The final score was less than the total required. There was a mix up\/confusion on point that was deep. Lee was not able to call it (since it was behind her). There was a conversation at the net and Zadie continued with her service. The day ended with a net serve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nZADIE<\/strong><\/td>\nXEE LEE<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n10\/14-.714<\/td>\n3\/13-.231<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n40\/40-1.000<\/td>\n17\/18-.944<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.659<\/td>\n.235<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n41<\/strong><\/td>\n17<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n202<\/strong><\/td>\n83<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n4.927<\/td>\n4.882<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n20 (.488)<\/td>\n9 (.529)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n11 (.268)<\/td>\n4 (.235)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n21<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7 (.333)<\/td>\n7 (.875)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n2 (.095)<\/td>\n3 (.375)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n14 (.667)<\/td>\n1 (.125)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n20<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n7 (.333)<\/td>\n5 (.625)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n14 (.667)<\/td>\n3 (.375)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n14, 11<\/td>\nnone<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n2.333<\/td>\n0.400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n12.00<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/4-.500<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n18:45<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

CENTRAL 4, COMO PARK 3 There have been two themes this week—4-3 scores, and revenge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-5eL","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":19650,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19650","url_meta":{"origin":20135,"position":0},"title":"2022 Fourth Badminton Poll","date":"April 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully 1-27. Single and doubles ranked 1 to 9. State tournament for team and individuals will take place during the week of May 16-20. Sites to still be determined. The format\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19503,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19503","url_meta":{"origin":20135,"position":1},"title":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville v St. Paul Central","date":"March 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"BURNSVILLE 7, ST. PAUL CENTRAL 0 Burnsville continued their hot string to start the season with a sweep of St. Paul Central in a non-conference match up. Make that Burnsville-Prior Lake. The two are in a pairing arrangement for two years. This marks the second day in a row with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19569,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19569","url_meta":{"origin":20135,"position":2},"title":"2022 Second Badminton Poll","date":"April 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Once more information is available teams will be ranked. Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles are now ranked 1 to 7. TEAMS Johnson Washington Burnsville Highland Park Como Park Harding Edina Central Humboldt\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20102,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20102","url_meta":{"origin":20135,"position":3},"title":"Badminton Out & About: Harding 6, Central 1","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"HARDING 6, CENTRAL 1 It was a good Knight for Harding as they topped Central 6-1 in an early (four o\u2019clock) start in St. Paul action on Thursday. The Minutemen\u2019s only victory came at third singles, and that came in three sets, one of two matches that went the distance\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19684,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19684","url_meta":{"origin":20135,"position":4},"title":"2022 Fifth Badminton Poll","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles ranked 1 to 12. Interesting Facts: Burnsville leads in match wins in singles with 44. Second is Highland Park at 42. Burnsville also leads in match wins\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19610,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19610","url_meta":{"origin":20135,"position":5},"title":"2022 Third Badminton Poll","date":"April 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"2022 THIRD BADMINTON POLL Once more information is available teams will be ranked. Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. This week I charted six more teams.\u00a0 Of the teams that have played a match so far I have six more to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20135"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20135"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20135\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20136,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20135\/revisions\/20136"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}