{"id":20202,"date":"2023-05-08T21:47:32","date_gmt":"2023-05-09T02:47:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20202"},"modified":"2023-05-09T17:22:00","modified_gmt":"2023-05-09T22:22:00","slug":"badminton-out-about-burnsville-triangular-5-8-2023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20202","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville Triangular 5.8.2023"},"content":{"rendered":"

BURNSVILLE TRIANGULAR OUT & ABOUT 5.8.2023<\/strong><\/p>\n

The last triangular of the regular season wrapped up with Burnsville taking two matches, Harding splitting, and Eden Prairie shut out. The focal point of the trio of matches was the final where the hosts took the last two matches in three sets over Harding out to complete a 5-2 win. Harding made a few adjustments to their lineup. Sea Lee left her first doubles partner and went to third singles. She and Ana Xiong, the former third singles, now at fourth singles, both won their matches today.<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES<\/strong><\/p>\n

GAME 1: MADDIE BLACKBOURN 2, SANI DESHMUKH 0<\/strong><\/p>\n

(21-8, 21-11)<\/p>\n

Maddie Blackbourn\u2019s strong side out game kept Eden Prairie\u2019s Sani Deshmukh bottled up in a two set win, both with double figure margins. Deshmukh was not able to generate a run and only managed to score four points off serve compared to Blackbourn\u2019s 26. The points in this contest trended to fast with close to half lasting two strokes (or less).<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nBLACKBOURN<\/strong><\/td>\nDESHMUKH<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n12\/16-.750<\/td>\n7\/17-.412<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First run<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n26<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n38\/41-.927<\/td>\n20\/20-1.000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.619<\/td>\n.286<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n42<\/strong><\/td>\n19<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n144<\/strong><\/td>\n70<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n3.429<\/td>\n4.368<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n26<\/strong><\/td>\n11<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n16<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n13, 10<\/td>\n0, 1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n3.25<\/td>\n0.688<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n11.50<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/2-1.000<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n11:56<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

GAME 2: KANLAYA THAO 2, SANI DESHMUKH 0
\n<\/strong>(21-7, 21-12)<\/p>\n

This was almost a d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu game. Replace Thao for Blackbourn and the final margin is the same. The difference was Deshmukh was able to generate runs and had a lead in the second set. Thao trailed in the second set 10-9 and then went on a 12-2 scoring spree. Fatigue may have been a factor. Not just physical fatigue, but decision making. Both players error totals jumped in the second set from 4 to 9 for Thao and 6 to 13 for Deshmukh. Of Thao\u2019s last 12 points seven were on Deshmukh hitting errors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nTHAO<\/strong><\/td>\nDESHMUKH<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n6\/11-.545<\/td>\n3\/12-.250<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First run<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n31<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n40\/41-.976<\/td>\n19\/20-.950<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.738<\/td>\n.474<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n42<\/strong><\/td>\n19<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n162<\/strong><\/td>\n64<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n3.857<\/td>\n3.368<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n23<\/strong><\/td>\n6<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n13<\/strong><\/td>\n19<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n14, 9<\/td>\n1, 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.765<\/td>\n0.316<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n11.50<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/2-1.000<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n13:13<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

GAME 3: MADDIE BLACKBOURN 2, KANLAYA THAO 0
\n<\/strong>(16-21, 21-18, 23-21)<\/p>\n

Maddie Blackbourn stormed back, not only from being down one set, but trailing in the second set also 18-13. She started her epic run with a six stroke smash. The smash was the winner de jour in the second set for Blackbourn who ended up with 11. Her finishing kick of eight straight points started with seven straight winners. The streak continued on into the final set as she scored the first three points. But this time it was going to be Thao who would hold off fate. Thao faced match point three times and survived. Neither player could finish at 21. Blackbourn had her fourth match point after a four stroke clear to the right back corner. The 36 minute match (16 minutes alone for the final frame) ended with a twelve stroke hitting error.<\/p>\n

A couple of interesting facts: Blackbourn\u2019s winner totals by set were 7-16-12. We already explained about the 11 smashes in the second. But she had to shift to the less spectacular clear for the main winner in set three—six times. Thao seemed to gain strength on winners as the match wore on\u00a0 9-10-15. Consistently the smash was her go to shot. She racked up 15 points in that manner.<\/p>\n

Both players really were intent on smashing. So much so I charted to chart how many blocks a player had, but it was only for the third set. Each player did a better job picking up and neutralizing the smash. At least eight times Thao utilized her block.<\/p>\n

These two players may have to get used to each other quickly. They could face each other in the team portion of the state tournament and then there is the individual tournament. If you missed today\u2019s contest, you might be able to check out the action between these two again.<\/p>\n

x<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nBLACKBOURN<\/strong><\/td>\nTHAO<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n17\/33-.515<\/td>\n20\/34-.588<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n1, 3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n1, 2, 3<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First run<\/td>\n1, 2, 3<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n28<\/td>\n28<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n53\/60-.883<\/td>\n57\/60-.950<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.467<\/td>\n.467<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n60<\/strong><\/td>\n60<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n29<\/td>\n32<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n259<\/strong><\/td>\n228<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n4.317<\/td>\n3.800<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n28<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n35<\/strong><\/td>\n34<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n26<\/strong><\/td>\n25<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n3, 3, 6<\/td>\n5, 5, 2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.346<\/td>\n1.360<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n0.00<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/6-.333<\/td>\n1\/1-1.000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n36:00<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

GAME 3: FIRST DOUBLES<\/strong><\/p>\n

BURNSVILLE (Jasmine Tran \/ Sherlyn Rojas) 2, HARDING (Christina Chang \/ Lilian Reiter) 0 (21-16, 21-14)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Last week Burnsville tweaked their first doubles line up when Jasmine Tran moved to third singles in the match against Johnson. Today she was back. This time it was Harding\u2019s turn to tweak their first doubles line up. Shia Lee moved to third singles. Replacing her was Lilian Reiter, who played most of the year at third doubles. Christina Chang did not move. It came down to scoring on serve or preventing the other side from scoring on their serve. Burnsville did a better job at both. Sherlyn Rojas scored on her serve 87% of the time while Tran let loose eight smashes in a first set win. Rojas delivered five runs for the day, one less than the other three combined. On Rojas\u2019 second service in the first set her run of four put the Blaze up for good. On her fourth service she tacked on two more (plus the side out) to give Burnsville a 19-15 advantage. The set was capped by Tran\u2019s eighth smash of the set, seven strokes to the left side of the court. In set two Rojas got the Blaze up 6-3 on her first run which came on her second service. She nailed two straight aces, one a no go to the right, and the other a swing and a miss on the left. Rojas had three total aces in the match. No other player had any. On Rojas\u2019 third service she rattled off six straight to build the Blaze their biggest lead of ten (16-6). At this stage the five points after the side out were all on hitting errors, two of which came on serve. Harding was not through yet. They had a late rally of three and then four to close the gap to 17-13. A missed serve ended that momentum. Tran had a backhand drive on the third stroke for a 19-13 lead. Tran did not have a smash in the second set. It was on Rojas to deliver, and she had two smashes to close the match, one of four and then three.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nTRAN<\/strong><\/td>\nROJAS<\/strong><\/td>\nCHANG<\/strong><\/td>\nREITER<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out when receiving<\/td>\n7\/14-.500<\/td>\n5\/12-.417<\/td>\n4\/20-.200<\/td>\n8\/18-.444<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Scoring on service<\/td>\n7\/10-.700<\/td>\n7\/8-.875<\/td>\n5\/8-.625<\/td>\n3\/8-.375<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n16\/18-.889<\/td>\n22\/24-.917<\/td>\n16\/17-.941<\/td>\n11\/13-.846<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.238<\/td>\n.381<\/td>\n.300<\/td>\n.167<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n84<\/strong><\/td>\n74<\/strong><\/td>\n77<\/strong><\/td>\n66<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n11<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n5<\/strong><\/td>\n3<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SET UP POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n8<\/strong><\/td>\n6<\/strong><\/td>\n11<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n12<\/strong><\/td>\n12<\/strong><\/td>\n7<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.222<\/td>\n0.75<\/td>\n.417<\/td>\n.273<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TEAM<\/strong><\/td>\nBURNSVILLE<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nHARDING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n42<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n30<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n <\/td>\n14<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n <\/td>\n1<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n <\/td>\n2<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n4.10<\/td>\n <\/td>\n4.13<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n <\/td>\n11<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n <\/td>\n9<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest lead<\/td>\n5, 10<\/td>\n <\/td>\n3, 0<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n6.000<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/2-1.000<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n14:20<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BURNSVILLE TRIANGULAR OUT & ABOUT 5.8.2023 The last triangular of the regular season wrapped up with Burnsville<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-5fQ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":20026,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20026","url_meta":{"origin":20202,"position":0},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #2","date":"April 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is badminton poll #2 Seven more teams joined action last week. There is probably one, possibly two more teams to start action. Singles now has ten players listed. Doubles have eight listed. Some Number 2s have made both lists. This next week will be relatively quiet as Minneapolis and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20040,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20040","url_meta":{"origin":20202,"position":1},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #3","date":"April 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It was a relatively quiet week last week with Minneapolis & St. Paul both off for spring break.\u00a0 That means not much change at the top---all three #1s remain the same. I was able to get two more teams charted bringing the total to 14 of the 27 completed or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":469,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=469","url_meta":{"origin":20202,"position":2},"title":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville Triangular with Harding & Eden Prairie 4.26.2017","date":"April 26, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"BURNSVILLE TRIANGULAR #1 Burnsville hosted Harding and Eden Prairie in a triangular on Wednesday. This is the final edition. HARDING 4, BURNSVILLE 3 There was a clear delineation here with the Knights taking all four singles and the Blaze taking all three doubles. Doubles were more contentious with three sets\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton Out & About"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19992,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19992","url_meta":{"origin":20202,"position":3},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #1","date":"March 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is the first badminton poll of 2023 . I will add the schools once they have played a match. There are at least eight, maybe ten schools yet to play.\u00a0 Among the teams that have yet to go----Edina, Eden Prairie----they are set to begin this week. First will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19610,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19610","url_meta":{"origin":20202,"position":4},"title":"2022 Third Badminton Poll","date":"April 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"2022 THIRD BADMINTON POLL Once more information is available teams will be ranked. Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. This week I charted six more teams.\u00a0 Of the teams that have played a match so far I have six more to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20282,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20282","url_meta":{"origin":20202,"position":5},"title":"Badminton Out & About: Numbers from the State Singles & Doubles; plus Final Team Records 2023","date":"May 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"END OF THE YEAR WRAP Here are some interesting stats from the state individual tournaments. SINGLES In the first set five players lost and came back and won. Thirteen matches lasted three sets. Two players won twice in three sets----Sandy Vang of Johnson and Phlower Vang of Highland Park. Phlower\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20202"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20202"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20211,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20202\/revisions\/20211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}