{"id":20794,"date":"2024-05-13T20:15:52","date_gmt":"2024-05-14T01:15:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20794"},"modified":"2024-05-13T21:03:52","modified_gmt":"2024-05-14T02:03:52","slug":"badminton-out-about-burnsville-vs-edison-5-13-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20794","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Out &#038; About: Burnsville vs Edison 5.13.2024"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>BURNSVILLE 6, EDISON 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>#16 Burnsville scored 6-1 victory over visiting #17 Edison to open<!--more--> the team state tournament on Monday. Last year the Blaze finished second in the state tournament to Edina. With the win they face the defending champion Hornets tomorrow. The Blaze are now on a two game winning streak.<\/p>\n<p>Edison first singles Amelia Larson was the only obstacle in the way of a sweep (more in first singles). The rest of the matches all went two sets. The biggest margins came at doubles with Katie Murray and Natalie Portwood holding their opponent to an average of four. There were a handful of tight sets, Celina Cheng of Burnsville opened with a two point win over Larson at first singles. The only set that went to extra points came at third doubles in the first set where the Burnsville duo of Jadali Kuch and Viollet Ruano outlasted the Tommie pair of Hasiba Walizada and Samreen Ayub 23-21.<\/p>\n<p>This match got off to a late start. A few results already filtered in before the birds flew. The Edison bus was delayed.<\/p>\n<p>The past few years only the top sixteen teams were involved in the team portion of the state tournament. This year, away from the pandemic restrictions, the field was opened up to all that wanted to participate.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SINGLES<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Amelia Larson, E def Celina Cheng 19-21, 21-13, 21-12<\/li>\n<li>Miaoting Fang, B def Addie Brookins 21-7, 21-8<\/li>\n<li>Isabel Lange, B def Paris Garcia Mejia 21-18, 21-17<\/li>\n<li>Jihan Mahamed, B def Gail Sisomphane 21-11, 21-14<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>DOUBLES<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Katie Murray\/ Natalie Portwood, B def Ada \/ Julia 21-6, 21-2<\/li>\n<li>Rose Lund \/ Grace Aguilar, B def Afnaan Ali \/ Bilen Ararso 21-12, 21-12<\/li>\n<li>Jadali Kuch\/ Viollet Ruano, B def Hasiba Walizada\/ Samreen Ayub 23-21, 21-7<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>BY THE NUMBERS<br \/>\nSINGLES<br \/>\nMatches<\/strong>: Burnsville 3-1 .750<br \/>\n<strong>Games<\/strong>: Burnsville 7-2 .778<br \/>\n<strong>points<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 172-136 .558<br \/>\n<strong>Set 1 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 84-55 .604<br \/>\n<strong>Set 2 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 76-60 .558<br \/>\n<strong>Set 3 points:<\/strong> Edison 21-12 .637<br \/>\n<strong>decided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0Burnsville 3-0 1.000<br \/>\n<strong>decided by 3<\/strong>-: Burnsville 2-0 1.000<br \/>\n<strong>margin<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 4.000<br \/>\n<strong>DOUBLES<br \/>\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 3-0 1.000<br \/>\n<strong>Games<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 6-0 1.000<br \/>\n<strong>points<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 128-60 .681<br \/>\n<strong>Set 1 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 65-39 .625<br \/>\n<strong>Set 2 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 63-21 .750<br \/>\n<strong>decided by 10+:<\/strong> Burnsville 3-0 1.000<br \/>\n<strong>decided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0Burnsville 1-0 1.000<br \/>\n<strong>margin<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 11.333<\/p>\n<p><strong>FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Amelia LARSON 2, Celina CHENG 1 <\/strong>(19-21, 21-13, 21-12)<\/p>\n<p>Amelia Larson provided the Tommies with their only win of the day in a three set contest with Celina Cheng. Larson bounced back from a first set loss that saw Cheng go on a tear late with the last six points. After that episode Larson only allowed two more runs and ten service points across two sets compared to the three runs and twelve in the first. On top of that Larson cleaned up her errors from game one\u2019s 13 to only two in set two and six in three.<\/p>\n<p>Larson established a strong start with the first two runs on her first two services (8-3). That lead stayed with Larson until a seven stroke error put the bird in Cheng\u2019s hand. She never gave it back with two three set smashes in the final six points.<\/p>\n<p>Set two again had Larson get off to the quick lead, this time with three runs across her first four services (10-3). Cheng closed the gap with a run of four (10-7). After that she only squeezed two points off service while Larson tacked on two runs to open things up.<\/p>\n<p>The third set saw Larson rattle off the first seven points, her longest run of the day and that set the tone. Cheng did get as close as 9-6m but Larson was able to score on three of her last four services including the last four points of the match.<\/p>\n<p>Larson had 16 more winners with two double digit winners in clears and drives each going for eleven.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>Category<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>LARSON<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>CHENG<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Side out<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">12\/26-.462<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">10\/26-.385<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Longest side out string<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">3+ Runs<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">10<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Longest point string<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">7<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">First serve<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">1, 2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">First point<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">2, 3<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Service points<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">36<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">22<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Serving %<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">57\/60-.950<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">46\/47-.979<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Point generated off serve<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">.590<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">.478<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>61<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>46<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Points after 11<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">28<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">27<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Points after own errors<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">9<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Winners after own errors<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>245<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>220<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Strokes per point<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">4.016<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">4.783<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">21<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">21<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">17<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>41<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>25<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Aces<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Blocks<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">0<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Clears<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">11<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Drives<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">11<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Drops<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Soft drives<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">5<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Smashes<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">7<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">13<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">2<sup>nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">7<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">28<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>21<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>19<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Deep<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Net<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">11<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Wide<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">4<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Serve<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Even stroke errors<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">9<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">2<sup>nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">3<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">12<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\"><strong>WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"105\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Left<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">17<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Right<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">24<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Largest Lead<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">6, 8, 9<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">2, 0, 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">W:E Ratio<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">1.952<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">1.316<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Margin<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">5.000<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">&nbsp;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Set Point %<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">2\/3-.667<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">1\/1-1.000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"181\">Time<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">33:00<\/td>\n<td width=\"105\">Real time<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BURNSVILLE 6, EDISON 1 #16 Burnsville scored 6-1 victory over visiting #17 Edison to open<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-5po","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":19727,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19727","url_meta":{"origin":20794,"position":0},"title":"2022 Sixth Badminton Poll & State Tournament information","date":"May 9, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. All teams\u00a0 are ranked 1-27. Single and doubles ranked 1 to 12. STATE TOURNAMENT Schools need to send me their line ups by Thursday, May 12 for the team (first through fourth singles; first through\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Badminton&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20538,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20538","url_meta":{"origin":20794,"position":1},"title":"2024 Badminton Poll #2","date":"March 30, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"With more teams starting their season, we are close to 100% of the schools in action. Three have yet to take the court this season and therefore are not ranked. Once they do, they will be up. With the snow out on Tuesday I was only able to chart six\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Badminton&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":723,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=723","url_meta":{"origin":20794,"position":2},"title":"Badminton State Team Seeds","date":"May 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"BADMINTON STATE TOURNAMENT Next week the State Badminton tournament takes place over four days. Monday and Tuesday feature the team portion; Wednesday and Thursday conclude with the individual singles and doubles tournament. Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday events will be held at Burnsville. Monday there will be eight different sites. Here\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Badminton&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19992,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19992","url_meta":{"origin":20794,"position":3},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #1","date":"March 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is the first badminton poll of 2023 . I will add the schools once they have played a match. There are at least eight, maybe ten schools yet to play.\u00a0 Among the teams that have yet to go----Edina, Eden Prairie----they are set to begin this week. First will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Badminton&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":14003,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=14003","url_meta":{"origin":20794,"position":4},"title":"Badminton Thursday Results 5.2.2019","date":"May 3, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"SAINT PAUL HUMBOLDT 4, COMO PARK 3 SINGLES 1 Nag Poe, CP def Lay Lay 21-14, 21-18 2 Shar Too, CP def Let Let 21-17, 21-14 3 Taw Bee, CP def Naw Paw 21-7, 21-8 4 Htoo Eh Say, H def Pa Nra Lee 15-21, 21-16, 21-18 DOUBLES 1 Eh\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Badminton&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8028,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=8028","url_meta":{"origin":20794,"position":5},"title":"Final Badminton Team Poll","date":"May 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"BADMINTON FINAL TEAM POLL Here is the final poll of the 2018 season. The sites and teams for the state tournament follow. The individual final poll will come out on Friday. 1 Johnson 2 Washington 3 Harding 4 Como Park 5 Central 6 Burnsville 7 Eden Prairie 8 Edina 9\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Badminton&quot;","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20794"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20794"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20794\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20801,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20794\/revisions\/20801"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}