{"id":600,"date":"2017-05-04T19:23:31","date_gmt":"2017-05-05T00:23:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=600"},"modified":"2017-05-04T21:05:34","modified_gmt":"2017-05-05T02:05:34","slug":"badminton-out-about-burnsville-triangular-5-4-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=600","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville Triangular 5.4.2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

BURNSVILLE<\/strong> TRIANGULAR<\/strong><\/p>\n

Final edition
\n<\/p>\n

Everybody was tied up in knots in a Suburban Triangular Thursday afternoon. As a result, the clarity of seeding teams in the state tournament is still muddy. #10 Burnsville opened with a 5-2 win over #11 Kennedy. The Eagles then had their own 5-2 win over #9 Edina. The Hornets completed the circle with a 4-3 win over the hosts. That left all three teams with a 1-1 record. What is a ranker to do? The next level I would look at is the matches won for the day: Burnsville 8, Kennedy 7, Edina 6. Using that standard the hosts were the \u201cwinners\u201d for the day. Needless to say all three teams are bunched still\u00a0and there were some things each team can take some joy in, but no one left overjoyed.<\/p>\n

BURNSVILLE<\/strong> 5, KENNEDY 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Blaze swept the doubles and squeezed out two three set wins at second and third singles. At the end of the first set Kennedy led in all four singles. \u00a0A change of two points at second singles and two points in third singles would have given the Eagles a 4-3 win.<\/p>\n

This was Burnsville’s second win over Kennedy this season.<\/p>\n

SINGLES
\n<\/strong>1. Chusang Nhasang, K def Megan Peterson 21-7, 21-9
\n2. Theresa Tourtillott, B def Angela Taing 19-21, 21-19, 21-18
\n3. Makayla Haddorf, B def Vichhecka Chy 15-21, 21-18, 22-20
\n4. Yan-Mei Yuan, K def Jaylin Wong 21-9, 16-21, 21-9<\/p>\n

DOUBLES
\n<\/strong>1. Sarah Leahy\/Greta Donnelly, B def Tran Nguyen\/Kim Nguyen 21-5, 21-15
\n2. Thanh Nguyen\/Elena Luu, B def Yan-Ling Yuan\/Anh Nguyen 21-8, 21-10
\n3. Carly Dahl\/Hana Handzija, B def Guadalupe Fernandez\/Jewell 21-13, 21-13<\/p>\n

BY THE NUMBERS
\nSINGLES
\nMatches<\/strong>: split 2-2 .500
\nGames<\/strong>: Kennedy 6-5
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Kennedy 217-174 .555
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0Kennedy 3-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3<\/strong>-: Burnsville 4-1 .800
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Kennedy 3.909
\nDOUBLES
\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 3-0 1.000
\nGames<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 6-0 1.000
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 126-64 .663
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong> Burnsville 3-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0none
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 10.333<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

chusang NHASANG 2, megan PETERSON 0
\n(21-7, 21-9)<\/p>\n

#2 Chusang Nhasang sided out at 86% and held Megan Peterson to single digits in a two set win. Nhasang came up with 22 winners with the power game evident in the first set with four of her six smashes. In the second set Nhasang stretched the floor with four winners each in clears and drops.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nNHASANG <\/strong><\/td>\nPETERSON<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n12\/14-.857<\/td>\n4\/15-.267<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n28<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Overall points<\/td>\n42<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n22<\/strong><\/td>\n9<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n7<\/strong><\/td>\n20<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n3.143<\/td>\n0.450<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n13.000<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/2-1.000<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n10:42.77<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n


\nKENNEDY 5, EDINA 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kennedy swept the singles, this time they were able to turn second and third singles in three sets. In addition they added second doubles. Since we looked a change of points in the first set, a change of points—4 at second singles and two at third singles would have given Edina a 4-3 win.<\/p>\n

This was the Eagles second win over Edina this year.<\/p>\n

SINGLES
\n<\/strong>1. Chusang Nhasang, K def Mia Coma 21-7, 21-10
\n2. Angela Taing, K def Talia Bjeland 19-21, 21-11, 21-17
\n3. Yan-Mei Yuan, K def Kila Panchot 21-13, 18-21, 21-19
\n4. Vichhecka Chy, K def Uma Kumar 21-15, 21-13<\/p>\n

DOUBLES
\n<\/strong>1. Ella Kile\/Sydney Sabow, E def Tran Nguyen\/Kim Nguyen 21-12, 21-5
\n2. Yan-Ling Yuan\/Anh Nguyen, K \u00a0def Olivia LaLuzerne\/Uma Bhati 21-13, 21-14
\n3. Maren Naegele\/Arden Ruehl, E def Guadalupe Fernandez\/Jewell 21-8, 21-12<\/p>\n

BY THE NUMBERS
\nSINGLES
\nMatches<\/strong>: Kennedy 4-0 1.000
\nGames<\/strong>: Kennedy 8-2 .800
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Kennedy 205-147 .582
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0Kennedy 3-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3<\/strong>-: Edina 2-1 .667
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Kennedy 5.800
\nDOUBLES
\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 2-1 .667
\nGames<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 4-2 .667
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 111-79 .584
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong> Edina 2-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0none
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 5.333<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

chusang NHASANG 2, mia COMA 0
\n(21-7, 21-10)<\/p>\n

Chusang Nhasang held Coma to one winner in this match—-the first point in the second set—and only four service points in a sweep. Nhasang came up with 24 winners in the match, 8 of which came on the soft drive.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nNHASANG <\/strong><\/td>\nCOMA <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n12\/14-.857<\/td>\n4\/15-.267<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Overall points<\/td>\n41<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n24<\/strong><\/td>\n1<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n16<\/strong><\/td>\n17<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.500<\/td>\n0.059<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n12.00<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/2-1.000<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n11:18.49<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

EDINA<\/strong> 4, BURNSVILLE 3<\/strong><\/p>\n

Edina spoiled an outright Burnsville win for the day taking the third doubles match, the last match out breaking a three all tie. The two teams split singles, but the Hornets grabbed both odd doubles that went to three sets. How close was this match? Both teams ended up with the same amount of points 279-279. The “what if” game was too wide to tip the scales.<\/p>\n

Edina won the previous contest too.<\/p>\n

SINGLES
\n<\/strong>1. Mia Coma, E def Megan Peterson 21-12, 21-13
\n2. Talia Bjeland, E def Theresa Tourtillott 21-11, 21-15
\n3. Makayla Haddorf, B def Kila Panchot 22-20, 21-8
\n4. Jaylin Wong, B def Uma Kumar 21-13, 21-13<\/p>\n

DOUBLES
\n<\/strong>1. Ella Kyle\/Sydney Sabow, E def Sarah Leahy\/Greta Donnelly 21-13, 21-23, 21-15
\n2. Thanh Nguyen\/Elena Luu, B def Olivia LaLuzerne\/Uma Bhati 21-12, 21-11
\n3. Maren Naegele\/Arden Ruehl, E def Carly Dahl\/Hana Handzija 21-15, 13-21, 21-14<\/p>\n

BY THE NUMBERS
\nSINGLES
\nMatches<\/strong>: split 2-2 .500
\nGames<\/strong>: split 4-4 .500
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 138-136 .504
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0split 1-1 .500
\ndecided by 3<\/strong>-: Burnsville 1-0 1.000
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 0.250
\nDOUBLES
\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Edina 2-1 .667
\nGames<\/strong>:\u00a0split 4-4 .500
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 143-141 .504
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong> Edina 1-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0Burnsville 1-0 1.000
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 0.250<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

mia COMA 2, megan PETERSON 0
\n(21-11, 21-13)<\/p>\n

Mia Coma did not allow a run in the sweep over Megan Peterson. Peterson did have two more winners than Coma. Errors accounted for 71% of the points. For some reason the bird was flying deep in this match. The first four points of this match were all errors, all deep. One got the feeling of a deadline was to be met, or a plane\/train had to be met.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nCOMA <\/strong><\/td>\nPETERSON<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n14\/19-.737<\/td>\n10\/20-.500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n23<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Overall points<\/td>\n42<\/td>\n24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n12<\/strong><\/td>\n14<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n10<\/strong><\/td>\n30<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.200<\/td>\n0.467<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n9.000<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/4-.500<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n12:03.79<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BURNSVILLE TRIANGULAR Final edition<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-9G","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":20684,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20684","url_meta":{"origin":600,"position":0},"title":"2024 Badminton Poll #6","date":"April 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"We have two regular season weeks before state tournament week kicks off on May 13. Some conference races are to be determined in the upcoming week 7. Week 8 features the city conference singles and doubles championships. St. Paul\u2019s is usually a good indicator of state titles. A reminder to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7988,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=7988","url_meta":{"origin":600,"position":1},"title":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville Triangular with Edina & Kennedy 5.3.2018","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"BURNSVILLE TRIANGULAR WITH EDINA, KENNEDY For the second time this year these three suburban programs got together for a triangular. #6 Burnsville hosted and beat their visitors. The Blaze swept the #10 Eagles and edged out #8 Edina 4-3 taking all the singles, while the Hornets took all the doubles.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20601,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20601","url_meta":{"origin":600,"position":2},"title":"2024 Badminton Poll #4","date":"April 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"We are at the halfway point. Rolling spring break is finished. All teams will be in action next week. St. Paul moves their conference match start times to 5:30. I am up to 23 teams charted (82%). Five to go---North, Burnsville, Fridley, Hiawatha, TCA (I did see Burnsville at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20634,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20634","url_meta":{"origin":600,"position":3},"title":"2024 Badminton Poll #5","date":"April 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It was a topsy turvy week. Some upsets took place in team and individual play showcasing tight races across the board as we head for May. There are still a handful of unbeaten singles players, but the chances are high that whoever wins the title will have at least one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19684,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19684","url_meta":{"origin":600,"position":4},"title":"2022 Fifth Badminton Poll","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles ranked 1 to 12. Interesting Facts: Burnsville leads in match wins in singles with 44. Second is Highland Park at 42. Burnsville also leads in match wins\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19755,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19755","url_meta":{"origin":600,"position":5},"title":"2022 Seventh Badminton Poll: Final team","date":"May 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"This is the final team badminton poll for 2022. The top 16 teams qualify for the team portion of the state tournament. After the rankings I will put out the Sites and who plays who. A reminder I need the rosters of the tournament team, and the individual team. So\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/600"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=600"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/600\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":605,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/600\/revisions\/605"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}