{"id":7844,"date":"2018-04-26T19:35:08","date_gmt":"2018-04-27T00:35:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=7844"},"modified":"2018-04-26T19:35:08","modified_gmt":"2018-04-27T00:35:08","slug":"badminton-out-about-hmong-academy-v-trinity-4-26-2018","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=7844","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Out & About: Hmong Academy v Trinity 4.26.2018"},"content":{"rendered":"

HMONG ACADEMY 5, TRINITY 2<\/strong><\/p>\n

Today was a first for me—–This was the first time I made it over to Trinity of River Ridge (which is in Eagan). I had not been to the school for volleyball, or basketball, but it took a badminton match to break the string. Hmong Academy, the school without a home match this year, topped the newcomers to the badminton scene 5-2. The Tri-Hawks took third singles and second doubles for their wins. Singles proved to be the most competitive with the margin only 1.75 per set. Catherine Kieffer of Trinity actually had deep margins in her win at third singles with both sets greater than ten. Twice during the contest sets went to 23-21 with each school claiming a share. Hmong Academy took theirs in the first set at fourth singles, while Trinity used it in the first set at second doubles.<\/p>\n

For those that don\u2019t know, Trinity is in the shadow of the new Viking practice facility on the south side of 494 in Eagan.<\/p>\n

SINGLES
\n<\/strong>1. Neng Thao, HA def Maria Lotti 21-16, 21-14
\n2. PZ Yang, HA def Catherine Putzier 21-6, 21-18
\n3. Catherine Kieffer, T def Pazong Yang 21-10, 21-9
\n4. Amy Vang, HA def Maggie Kocon 23-21, 21-16<\/p>\n

DOUBLES
\n<\/strong>1. Helena\/Sun, HA def Bekah Bittner\/Maria Kisch 21-11, 21-15
\n2. Anna Mayer\/Emma Miller, T def Emily\/Haily 23-21, 21-18
\n3. Pajda\/Shylene, HA def Grace Flynn\/Kaity Kisch 21-13, 21-9<\/p>\n

BY THE NUMBERS
\nSINGLES
\nMatches<\/strong>: Hmong Academy 3-1 .750
\nGames<\/strong>: Hmong Academy 6-2 .750
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Hmong Academy 147-133 .525
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0Trinity 2-1 .667
\ndecided by 3<\/strong>-: Hmong Academy 2-0 1.000
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Hmong Academy 1.750
\nDOUBLES
\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Hmong Academy 2-1 .667
\nGames<\/strong>:\u00a0Hmong Academy 4-2 .667
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Hmong Academy 123-92 .572
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong> Hmong Academy 2-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0Trinity 2-0 1.000
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Hmong Academy 5.167<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

Neng THAO 2, Maria LOTTI 0
\n<\/strong>(21-16, 21-14)<\/p>\n

Hmong Academy\u2019s Neng Thao edged out Maria Lotti in two sets at first singles. This match had a heavy impact on taking advantage of errors committed by the other. Winners were few and far between. Thao had 17 for the match, about a 40% clip. Thao also sided out at 58% stopping. Her best side out string came in the second half when she stopped Lotti four straight services.<\/p>\n

Host Lotti started the match with the first three points (all errors from Thao). That would be her only string of three or more in the first set. Thao didn\u2019t take the lead until her first run of the day, the largest of the day as well, at six (9-5). For some reason I had 22 points for Thao in the first set. I don\u2019t think there was a replay involved.<\/p>\n

In set two Lotti again led early, but it was razor thin at 2-1 and 3-2. Thao, at about the same point in the first set, used a four point run to take command 9-5. On her next service she added three more for a 12-6 advantage. Lotti rallied with a run of four to close the gap to 16-13 capped by a five stroke drop. Neng recovered and closed with four straight started by a two stroke smash.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nTHAO<\/strong><\/td>\nLOTTI<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n11\/19-.579<\/td>\n8\/20-.400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n24<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n41\/44-.932<\/td>\n25\/29-.862<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.558<\/td>\n.367<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Short\/ pts w<\/td>\nnone<\/td>\n16\/6-.375<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep\/ pts w<\/td>\n44\/24-.558<\/td>\n13\/5-.385<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Overall points<\/td>\n43<\/td>\n30<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n21<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes<\/td>\n163<\/td>\n116<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n3.791<\/td>\n3.867<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies<\/td>\n14(.326)<\/td>\n10(.333)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies<\/td>\n18(.419)<\/td>\n9(.300)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n17(.395)<\/strong><\/td>\n10(.333)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n1(.059)<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n5(.294)<\/td>\n3(.300)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n4(.235)<\/td>\n1(.100)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n1(.059)<\/td>\n4(.400)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n3(.176)<\/td>\n2(.200)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n3(.176)<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n20(.667)<\/strong><\/td>\n25(.581)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n2(.100)<\/td>\n6(.240)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fan<\/td>\n1(.050)<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n10(.500)<\/td>\n11(.440)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n4(.200)<\/td>\n4(.160)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n3(.150)<\/td>\n4(.160)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Back line<\/td>\n5(.294)<\/td>\n3(.300)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Middle<\/td>\n6(.353)<\/td>\n1(.100)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Front line<\/td>\n6(.353)<\/td>\n6(.600)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n12(.706)<\/td>\n4(.400)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n5(.294)<\/td>\n6(.600)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n0.850<\/td>\n.400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n6.500<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/4-.500<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n15:35.09<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

HMONG ACADEMY 5, TRINITY 2 Today was a first for me—–This was the first time I made it over to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-22w","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":19992,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19992","url_meta":{"origin":7844,"position":0},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #1","date":"March 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is the first badminton poll of 2023 . I will add the schools once they have played a match. There are at least eight, maybe ten schools yet to play.\u00a0 Among the teams that have yet to go----Edina, Eden Prairie----they are set to begin this week. First will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19220,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19220","url_meta":{"origin":7844,"position":1},"title":"Tuesday Badminton Results 5.18.2021","date":"May 18, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"NON CON EDEN PRAIRIE 6, WASHBURN 1 See out & about for more detail KENNEDY 6, HMONG ACADEMY 1 SINGLES 1 Kim, K def Hmong Academy 21-13, 21-7 2 Taylor, K def Hmong Academy 21-11, 21-7 3 Hmong Academy def Itzel 21-14, 21-17 4 Genna, K def Hmong Academy 21-12,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19261,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19261","url_meta":{"origin":7844,"position":2},"title":"2021 Badminton Poll #7: Final Team","date":"May 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"This is the final Team poll. The final singles\/doubles will be posted on Saturday. TEAM\u00a0 1 Johnson \u00a0 2\u00a0Washington 3 Humboldt\u00a0\u00a0 4 Burnsville\u00a0 5 Harding\u00a0 6 Highland Park\u00a0 7 Como Park\u00a0 8\u00a0Central 9\u00a0Edina 10\u00a0Trinity 11\u00a0Eden Prairie\u00a0 12 Kennedy 13 Math & Science\u00a0\u00a0 14 Washburn\u00a0 15 Southwest 16\u00a0Community of Peace\u00a0\u00a0 17\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8028,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=8028","url_meta":{"origin":7844,"position":3},"title":"Final Badminton Team Poll","date":"May 7, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"BADMINTON FINAL TEAM POLL Here is the final poll of the 2018 season. The sites and teams for the state tournament follow. The individual final poll will come out on Friday. 1 Johnson 2 Washington 3 Harding 4 Como Park 5 Central 6 Burnsville 7 Eden Prairie 8 Edina 9\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19569,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19569","url_meta":{"origin":7844,"position":4},"title":"2022 Second Badminton Poll","date":"April 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Once more information is available teams will be ranked. Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles are now ranked 1 to 7. TEAMS Johnson Washington Burnsville Highland Park Como Park Harding Edina Central Humboldt\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":8146,"url":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=8146","url_meta":{"origin":7844,"position":5},"title":"STATE BADMINTON SEEDS & SCHOOL","date":"May 11, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Here are the top 8 seeds for singles and doubles. After that each school will have their first round match # and opponent listed. SINGLES 1. Johnson 1 2.\u00a0 Central 1 3. Harding 1 4. Johnson 2 5 Washington 1 6. Burnsville 1 7. Como Park 1 8. Washington 2\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7844"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7844"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7844\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7845,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7844\/revisions\/7845"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}