{"id":19503,"date":"2022-03-24T20:23:49","date_gmt":"2022-03-25T01:23:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19503"},"modified":"2022-03-24T20:23:49","modified_gmt":"2022-03-25T01:23:49","slug":"badminton-out-about-burnsville-v-st-paul-central","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19503","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville v St. Paul Central"},"content":{"rendered":"

BURNSVILLE 7, ST. PAUL CENTRAL 0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Burnsville continued their hot string to start the season with a sweep of St. Paul Central in a non-conference match up. Make that Burnsville-Prior Lake. The two are in a pairing arrangement for two years. This marks the second day in a row with a new twist. Yesterday it was North St. Paul, today Prior Lake on the other end of the metro. The Lakers have one player with the Blaze—Jasmine Tran at fourth singles. This was Central\u2019s first outing of the year. The Blaze had two games under their belt. In the eight single sets Burnsville outperformed Central by double digit margins six times. The doubles were more competitive with Central\u2019s only set win coming in set one of first doubles. There were two sets in doubles that went to extra points and each squad picking up one victory.<\/p>\n

SINGLES
\n<\/strong>1. Maddie Blackbourn, B def Zadie H 21-14, 24-20
\n2. Delaney Woog, B def Serenity 21-10, 21-10
\n3. Mina Nguyen, B def Rane R 21-10, 21-8
\n4. Jasmine Tran, B def Mayson Y 21-9, 21-11<\/p>\n

DOUBLES
\n<\/strong>1. Abby Briese\/Corrina Benson, B def Julia\/Emma 22-24, 21-14, 21-12
\n2. Lisa Genis\/Leah Merid, B def Jauyla\/Kyra 21-8, 21-16
\n3. Bonnie Hanson\/Sherlyn Morales, B def Isabelle\/Ella 21-11, 25-23<\/p>\n

BY THE NUMBERS
\nSINGLES
\nMatches<\/strong>: Burnsville 4-0 1.000
\nGames<\/strong>: Burnsville 8-0 1.000
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 171-92 .650
\nSet 1 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 84-43 .661
\nSet 2 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 87-49 .640
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong>\u00a0Burnsville 6-0 1.000
\ndecided by 3<\/strong>-: none
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 9.875
\nDOUBLES
\nMatches<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 3-0 1.000
\nGames<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 6-1 .857
\npoints<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 153-109 .583
\nSet 1 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 65-44 .596
\nSet 2 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 67-53 .558
\nSet 3 points:<\/strong> Burnsville 21-12 .636
\ndecided by 10+:<\/strong> Burnsville 2-0
\ndecided by 3-:<\/strong>\u00a0tied 1-1
\nmargin<\/strong>:\u00a0Burnsville 6.286<\/p>\n

FIRST SINGLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

Maddie BLACKBOURN 2, Zadie H 0
\n<\/strong>(21-14, 24-20)<\/p>\n

Burnsville\u2019s Maddie Blackbourn picked up her third win this season with a two set victory over Zadie H. The second set proved to be closer, with extra points needed—or were they needed. My charts had the game over at 21-18, but the game continued. Somewhere along the line the score count was adjusted. Blackbourn was better at the side out game (.739) and delivered more winners (25-14). A trio of shots led her winners with seven each for clears, soft drives and smashes. Both players had 20 errors on the night. Zadie had issues serving with seven missed serves—all deep or wide.<\/p>\n

The first set opened with a Blackbourn run of three, all on winners. Both players traded side outs the next eight points. Another Blackbourn run of four gave her a 12-5 lead. The rest of the set tightened up with Zadie getting her only run of three in the first set to make it 16-11. She further sliced a point off the deficit. Blackbourn closed with three straight points, the last two coming on clears.<\/p>\n

Zadie had two leads in the game, and that came on the first point in set two, and again at 4-3. Blackbourn strung together five straight points to get a cushion at 8-4. Another run of four pushed the lead to 19-12. This could have been where the score went off the rails. Zadie, with her back to the wall, then put together the longest string of the match with six straight points. All six were errors on Blackbourn\u2019s part including a 12 stroke wide. I thought it was over at 21-18, but the game continued for five more points. The contest ended on a three stroke clear by Blackbourn.<\/p>\n

x<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nBLACKBOURN<\/strong><\/td>\nZADIE H<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n17\/23-.739<\/td>\n14\/25-.560<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n4 (2x)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n22<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n43\/45-.956<\/td>\n27\/34-.794<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Overall points<\/td>\n45<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n23<\/td>\n21<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes<\/td>\n166<\/td>\n153<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n3.689<\/td>\n4.500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n25<\/strong><\/td>\n14<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n20<\/strong><\/td>\n20<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.25<\/td>\n0.70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest margin<\/td>\n8 (1s)<\/td>\n1 (2s)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n5.50<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/2-1.000<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n19:07<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BURNSVILLE 7, ST. PAUL CENTRAL 0 Burnsville continued their hot string to start the season with a<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-54z","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":19992,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19992","url_meta":{"origin":19503,"position":0},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #1","date":"March 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is the first badminton poll of 2023 . I will add the schools once they have played a match. There are at least eight, maybe ten schools yet to play.\u00a0 Among the teams that have yet to go----Edina, Eden Prairie----they are set to begin this week. First will be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":820,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=820","url_meta":{"origin":19503,"position":1},"title":"Badminton History: State Doubles Champions","date":"May 17, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"if you have\u00a0missing information email\u00a0kja8067@gmail.com STATE\u00a0DOUBLES CHAMPIONS STATE\u00a0DOUBLES CHAMPIONS Harding & Johnson have 7 titles; Como Park 3; Burnsville, Central & Edison 2; Eden Prairie, South, and Washington 1 each. Only one pair have 2 titles Lindsey Bryant \/ Preetinder Bassi of Harding. Xai Yang of Harding is the only\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19540,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19540","url_meta":{"origin":19503,"position":2},"title":"2022 First Badminton Poll 4.3.2022","date":"April 3, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Once more information is available teams will be ranked. Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles will start ranking 1 to 5. As the season continues that should build out to at least eight.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20026,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20026","url_meta":{"origin":19503,"position":3},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll #2","date":"April 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Here is badminton poll #2 Seven more teams joined action last week. There is probably one, possibly two more teams to start action. Singles now has ten players listed. Doubles have eight listed. Some Number 2s have made both lists. This next week will be relatively quiet as Minneapolis and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19569,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19569","url_meta":{"origin":19503,"position":4},"title":"2022 Second Badminton Poll","date":"April 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Once more information is available teams will be ranked. Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles are now ranked 1 to 7. TEAMS Johnson Washington Burnsville Highland Park Como Park Harding Edina Central Humboldt\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":19684,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=19684","url_meta":{"origin":19503,"position":5},"title":"2022 Fifth Badminton Poll","date":"April 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Each team is to send their results after each match to kja8067@gmail.com or by text. Teams will be ranked fully. Single and doubles ranked 1 to 12. Interesting Facts: Burnsville leads in match wins in singles with 44. Second is Highland Park at 42. Burnsville also leads in match wins\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19503"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19503"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19503\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19504,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19503\/revisions\/19504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}