{"id":20668,"date":"2024-04-25T12:10:56","date_gmt":"2024-04-25T17:10:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20668"},"modified":"2024-04-25T12:10:56","modified_gmt":"2024-04-25T17:10:56","slug":"badminton-triangular-first-singles-recaps-with-burnsville-edina-highland-park","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20668","title":{"rendered":"Badminton Triangular: First Singles Recaps with Burnsville, Edina & Highland Park"},"content":{"rendered":"

Wednesday three of the top four singles players met at Burnsville. #1 Phlower Vang of Highland won two of those matches, but the second win was an injury forfeit win because #4 Jasmine Tran of Burnsville went down with what appeared to be a knee injury after the first point of the second set. Tran won the first set. Just looking at sets the records were
\nVang 2-1
\nTsephel 2-2
\nTran 1-2<\/p>\n

Add in the margin and
\nVang +4, +8, -6 overall +6
\nTran -4, -4, +6 overall -2
\nTsephel +4, +4, -4, -8 overall -4<\/p>\n

Only in the first match of the day were both players fresh. Fatigue and a drop in production affected both Tsephel and Vang. Tsephel\u2019s production in winners were 14-15-11-6 while Vang\u2019s winners also declined 15-12-10. Tran, who had some time to recover between the first and third match was the only player to see an increase (or at least stabilization) in winners as the day went on 7-11-11.<\/p>\n

Some other points of emphasis: Vang\u2019s side out % against Tsephel in the first set of their match was .700, the best of the day. The only other side out % above .600 was Tsephel\u2019s against Tran in the first set of their match .667.<\/p>\n

MATCH 1: TSEPHEL V TRAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tsephel built up a huge lead in set one at 14-4 with runs on service two and four, but Tran bounced back quickly with a day\u2019s best (tied) run of eight to get to 14-12. Hitting errors were the main fuel in that run for Tran including three straight two stroke errors. Tsephel ended up with six net errors, mostly on the soft drives that failed to go the distance. On Tsephel\u2019s eighth service she added a run of three. Tran got to within one three times prior to that. Tran mistakenly thought the match was over at 20-17 and had to return to action.The drive was the winner of choice for Tsephel with six in the first set.<\/p>\n

Tsephel had another quick start to the second set getting off to a 7-1 lead thanks to a run of five on service number two which was initiated with three straight smashes. Tran was able to squeeze points off of service four straight times to close the gap to 11-10 with her only run coming on service four. Six straight side outs kept the margins between two and one. A missed serve opened up a last three-point run coming on Tsephel\u2019s eleventh service which put her at the brink. Tsephel utilized six smashes for winners in this set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nTSEPHEL<\/strong><\/td>\nTRAN<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n12\/20-.600<\/td>\n9\/19-.474<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n21<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n41\/41-1.000<\/td>\n33\/35-.943<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.500<\/td>\n.441<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n21, 21-42<\/strong><\/td>\n17, 17-34<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n22<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n177<\/strong><\/td>\n149<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n4.214<\/td>\n4.382<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n14, 15-29<\/strong><\/td>\n7, 11-18<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n10, 6-16<\/strong><\/td>\n6, 6-12<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n10, 6<\/td>\n0, 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.813<\/td>\n1.500<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n4.000<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/4-.500<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n17:06<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

MATCH TWO: VANG V TSEPHEL<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tsephel opened with the first run on service two for a 4-1 lead. Vang then burst out with a day\u2019s high run of eight (tied) to take a 9-4 lead. Tsephel tied the set right back at nine with her last run of five. The match was at a stalemate until Vang broke free on service nine after being held scoreless on four straight serves with a run of three to make it 18-15. Vang\u2019s favorite winner in this set was the soft drive for five points.<\/p>\n

Vang got runs on the first three services on the way to a big 10-2 lead. Tsephel responded with her only run of that set with four to get to 10-6. Vang blew the game open with a run of seven on her seventh service to get to the cusp at 20-11. In this set the drop was Vang\u2019s favorite shot with five winners. Vang closed this match with a 8-2 finish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nVANG<\/strong><\/td>\nTSEPHEL<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n10\/17-.588<\/td>\n9\/17-.529<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n25<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n42\/42-1.000<\/td>\n29\/30-.967<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.595<\/td>\n.433<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n21, 21-42<\/strong><\/td>\n17, 13-30<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n73<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n148<\/strong><\/td>\n138<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n3.524<\/td>\n4.600<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n15, 12-27<\/strong><\/td>\n11, 6-17<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n6, 7-13<\/strong><\/td>\n6, 9-15<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n67<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n5, 9<\/td>\n3, 0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n2.077<\/td>\n1.133<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n6.000<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n2\/5-.400<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n18:39<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

GAME 3: VANG v TRAN<\/strong><\/p>\n

This match was abbreviated due to Tran\u2019s injury on the first point of the second set. She went back to clear the bird and landed awkwardly on one leg. The bird sailed deep for Vang\u2019s point.<\/p>\n

In set one Tran got the jump with a run of five on her first service establishing a 5-1 lead. Vang added three, but then Tran tacked on another run of six to hold an 11-4 advantage. Vang had a last run of four on her seventh service closing the gap to 17-13. Tran\u2019s smash game was evident with eight winners, six coming on side outs to Vang\u2019s service, with four coming on the two stroke.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/td>\nTRAN<\/strong><\/td>\nVANG<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Side out<\/td>\n5\/9-.556<\/td>\n4\/9-.444<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest side out string<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3+ Runs<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Longest point string<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SERVING<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First serve<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
First point<\/td>\n <\/td>\n1, 2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Service points<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serving %<\/td>\n21\/21-1.000<\/td>\n14\/16-.875<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Point generated off serve<\/td>\n.571<\/td>\n.438<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
POINTS<\/strong><\/td>\n21<\/strong><\/td>\n16<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after 11<\/td>\n10<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Points after own errors<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Winners after own errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
STROKES<\/strong><\/td>\n72<\/strong><\/td>\n62<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Strokes per point<\/td>\n3.429<\/td>\n3.875<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5+ rallies (%)<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2- rallies (%)<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNERS<\/strong><\/td>\n11<\/strong><\/td>\n10<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Aces<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blocks<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Clears<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drives<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Drops<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Soft drives<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Smashes<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even Stroke Winners<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> Stroke Winners<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd Stroke Winners<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ERRORS<\/strong><\/td>\n6<\/strong><\/td>\n10<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Deep<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Net<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Wide<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Serve<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Even stroke errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2nd<\/sup> stroke errors<\/td>\n2<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Odd stroke errors<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
WINNER LOCATION<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Left<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Right<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Largest Lead<\/td>\n8, 0<\/td>\n1, 1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
W:E Ratio<\/td>\n1.833<\/td>\n1.000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Margin<\/td>\n2.50<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Set Point %<\/td>\n\u00bd-.500<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Time<\/td>\n9:15<\/td>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The first doubles recaps will probably come out on Friday at the earliest. I have to digest and tabulate the information.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Wednesday three of the top four singles players met at Burnsville.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8CdKT-5nm","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":20660,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20660","url_meta":{"origin":20668,"position":0},"title":"Badminton Out & About: Burnsville Triangular with Edina & Highland Park 4.24.2024","date":"April 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Blaze hosted Edina & Highland Park on Wednesday with the Hornets taking two wins, the Scots one. Burnsville was shut out. The day feature three of the top singles players around. In that case #1 Phlower Vang of Highland Park won twice, but the second win came after Burnsville's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20601,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20601","url_meta":{"origin":20668,"position":1},"title":"2024 Badminton Poll #4","date":"April 14, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"We are at the halfway point. Rolling spring break is finished. All teams will be in action next week. St. Paul moves their conference match start times to 5:30. I am up to 23 teams charted (82%). Five to go---North, Burnsville, Fridley, Hiawatha, TCA (I did see Burnsville at the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20259,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20259","url_meta":{"origin":20668,"position":2},"title":"Wednesday Badminton State Tournament Box Scores","date":"May 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"SEMIFINALS EDINA 4, JOHNSON 3 SINGLES Betsy Lundberg, E def Sandy Vang 22-20, 21-15 Tenzin Tsephel, E def Ashley Her 21-15, 16-21, 21-15 May Xiong, J def Hazel Dang 21-14, 19-21, 21-19 Claire Wetz, E def Ruth Thaw Gyi 16-21, 21-15, 22-20 DOUBLES Ivy Peterson \/ Sanna Coma, E def\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20634,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20634","url_meta":{"origin":20668,"position":3},"title":"2024 Badminton Poll #5","date":"April 20, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"It was a topsy turvy week. Some upsets took place in team and individual play showcasing tight races across the board as we head for May. There are still a handful of unbeaten singles players, but the chances are high that whoever wins the title will have at least one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20106,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20106","url_meta":{"origin":20668,"position":4},"title":"2023 Badminton Poll & News #5","date":"April 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Before we get to the polls, I am introducing a new feature: CAREER WINS Other sports have career leaders in points scored, or leaders in home runs. Badminton career wins seems to be the best option right now. If these numbers are incorrect or incomplete send me the documentation and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":20811,"url":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/?p=20811","url_meta":{"origin":20668,"position":5},"title":"Badminton State Wednesday Results: Edina Wins Second Straight Title","date":"May 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Edina Hornets survived a nailbiter in the semis, and then took the brooms to St. Paul Johnson in winning their second straight team title. The #1 seed Hornets trailed Highland Park 3-2 in the semis needing both matches still in play for the victory. Third doubles fell their way\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Badminton"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20668"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20668"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20668\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20669,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20668\/revisions\/20669"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kjasr.com\/live\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}